How I made do and mended

An author guest blog by Adam Fitzroy

The book that eventually became MAKE DO AND MEND started out very differently. It was originally going to be about four brothers, living on a not-entirely-successful family farm in Wales, fighting off a land-grab from a consortium that wanted to build a golf-course – and it was emphatically going to be taking place in the ‘present day’. However some elements of the story were in place even then; there would be conflict between the two elder brothers because Two was a nasty resentful piece of work and would undermine everything One was attempting to do, but Three and Four would turn out to be – perhaps to their own astonishment – good and sensible men who could be relied on in a crisis. There would also be a mysterious stranger to the village, a quiet, dignified older man, who would draw the attention of the hitherto flighty One and with whom he would eventually form a romantic relationship. Two and Three would be firmly heterosexual; Four’s preferences were still unknown.

I hadn’t written any of this before the plan changed dramatically. I’d been thinking about it and discussing it with friends for some considerable time, but there was something about it that just wasn’t gelling in my head. I don’t know, now, precisely what it was that prompted the change of direction, but one day it suddenly occurred to me that setting it during the Second World War would make it a more interesting project and radically change the dynamics of the situation. For one thing, there was huge pressure to produce food and other necessities for the war effort (flax, wood, etc.) so that even a farm that was struggling beforehand would enjoy a period of relative prosperity. For another, it would enable One to have a perspective on life and love that didn’t just revolve around the narrow confines of his familiar Welsh valley.

The valley itself was one of the constants. Being a regular traveller on trains between Newport and Chester, I’d always been intrigued by a village north of Abergavenny. There ought to be a station there, I thought, so that I could get out and explore – but there wasn’t. So I did my initial exploring online and on the OS map, and eventually managed to tour the area by car as well. I found the perfect site for the house, which ended up being called Hendra, but what was there was less prepossessing than I had in mind. Therefore, in a move I’m sure English Heritage would deplore, I picked up Stokesay Castle, made some alterations to its layout, and transported it a little matter of fifty miles down the road. I tacked on a somewhat rickety Home Farm a short distance away, and a couple of quarrymen’s cottages higher up the hill, and that was that – I had my location!

The joy of writing something like this is the research. Wanting a box-bed for Jim’s cottage I found just the thing online, which turned out to be in a rural museum on Orkney. Years later I got to meet it in person … and that was the trip which ended up inspiring IN DEEP. I also managed to fit in a visit to Western Approaches Command and chose one of its mysterious closed doors to be Harry’s decoding office. (I have no idea what was really behind it; it could have been a store-room or a doorway into Hades for all I know!) When I decided to make Jim a conscientious objector – because I’ve never forgotten the Dad’s Army episode in which Godfrey is revealed to be a conscientious objector – I researched the Peace Pledge Union, their white poppies, and the advocacy work they did. I hope that if I was ever in the position of being ordered to fight (unlikely now, given my age!) I would have the courage not simply to do as I was told but to say that I thought it was wrong and find another way of serving instead.

I could go on. The hotel in Liverpool exists, and has been the scene of numerous fannish conventions. The pub where Harry lodges sort-of exists; there is a pub there, but I transported a building in from another location because I liked it better. The road over Sermon Pass is a real road now, but at the time the book is set it was little more than a track. And as for Birkenhead Park … it’s a jewel, and was reputedly the model for Central Park in New York.

There are, of course, loose ends in MAKE DO AND MEND. Jack (Three) will stay at Hendra, married to Kitty, and their children will farm there in their turn. Thomas (Two) is likely to move away after the War, to some place where his predictable lack of success will be less visible to his family and he can be the person of importance he so clearly thinks he is. Harry (One) will emigrate, Jim at his side, to a country where nobody will care who they were before – possibly Canada. Jim will write books and teach; Harry will no doubt go into broadcasting in some capacity. They won’t be rich, but they’ll be happy. As for Freddie (Four), his future is more opaque; there is, somewhere in the back of my mind, a whole new set of adventures for him – one of which I’m hoping will coalesce into a short story for Manifold Press’s World War Two anthology CALL TO ARMS. In fact it would be fair to say that I have no idea, at the moment, precisely what happens to Freddie, but I’m very much looking forward to finding out!

[Oh, and the land-grabby golf-course-builders may well make an appearance at some point, too… ]

The purpose of a butterfly

An author guest blog
by Julie Bozza

I had quite a conservative and sheltered upbringing (and am eternally grateful to my friend Cathe, and to The Rocky Horror Picture Show, for helping me begin the process of opening out!) but I always took the idea of marriage equality seriously.

I also took the idea very personally, despite being an (apparently) cisgender woman happily married from the age of 20 to a (definitely) cisgender man. (I am actually way more complicated than that, as I suspect many of us are, but people tend to relate to me as such.) Despite having what everyone assumed was a ‘traditional’, legally permissible marriage, I felt the issue of marriage equality had a great deal to do with me and my own choices.

When marriage equality was first becoming a matter of wider public debate, Australia’s prime minister was John Howard, a conservative both personally and in politics. Whenever asked, he always defined marriage as being ‘between one man and one woman – for the purposes of having children’.

I could just roll my eyes at the first part of the definition, as of course that was the actual problem we were all arguing about. But the latter part of his definition really stuck in my craw. ‘For the purposes of having children.’

Mr B and I don’t have kids, and that was a deliberate mutual decision made during the first few years we were together, that we’ve never regretted. But that doesn’t mean our relationship isn’t a ‘proper’ marriage. It doesn’t mean we’re not a ‘proper’ family, despite it being only the two of us. And fie on John Howard for suggesting otherwise. (I am still rankling, all these years later!)

Not everyone wants to get married, of course, but I strongly feel that those who want to should be able to. That includes anyone of any sex, gender identity or sexuality – whether they can or can’t have (their own biological) children, and whether they intend to have children or not.

Marriage is a partnership between individuals, and each relationship will be different, and will grow and change over time. As long as everyone involved is happy and willing, the state can and should offer support, but otherwise mind its own business. In my opinion!

Why am I getting on my soapbox about this particular issue in relation to my novel BUTTERFLY HUNTER…? Because the crux of the matter was really brought home to me while researching for the story.

As can be inferred from the title, the main characters Dave and Nicholas are on a quest in the Australian Outback for a particular species of blue butterfly. As part of my research, I often browsed The Complete Field Guide to Butterflies of Australia by Michael F Braby.

Butterflies go through quite a complex life cycle, which involves four very different forms: egg, larva, pupa and adult. It’s the adult form we tend to think of when we think of butterflies – the beautiful, delicate winged creatures, who might live only for months or even days. For different (human) cultures, adult butterflies have symbolised transformation, change, joy, colour, the soul, and death.

I realise we humans are imposing symbolic meaning, and our love of beauty, on creatures who do not share our ways of thinking. However, it really brought me to a crashing halt when I read the following sentence in Braby’s Field Guide:

The adult, also known as the imago, is responsible chiefly for reproduction and dispersal.

And I’m not saying he’s wrong per se. He’s obviously right at some level. I’m just saying that this reductionist approach to life horrifies me. There is so much more to our human lives than making babies and placing them somewhere useful. Maybe a butterfly isn’t conscious enough in itself to think about more than mating, and then laying eggs in good locations. However, the facts that we can appreciate a butterfly’s beauty, and attach culturally-relevant symbolic meanings to them, proves that there’s a whole lot more to being human.

And so I say again, fie on John Howard and his reductive definitions of marriage, and fie on his successors as well. All these years later, Australia still hasn’t signed off on marriage equality. Let marriage be about choice and love, about transformation and life, about souls and joy. Let it be about a dinky-di fair go for all.

Come on, Aussie, come on! It’s more than time. We are way overdue. Get it done!

Vampires in Barcelona, 2042

FOOL'S ERRANDAn author guest blog
by Chris Quinton

About eleven years ago, I wanted to write a vampire story. This was when that particular genre took off in the world of ebooks, and I didn’t want to follow the established tropes that closely. I’d watched films, read books, both vampiric and science-fiction rather than whichever branch of the paranormal vampires occupy, and a tentative idea began to form. I talked it out with friends, especially the biology of vampires. Luckily, I have a forensic scientist among my contacts, and her input was invaluable.

At the end of all that, I had a six page ‘thesis’ on the biology and history of the vampire, and the vampire communities. Admittedly, it did get tweaked a bit once I got deeper into what would end up being Fool’s Errand … And because of the various political situations I wanted to play with, I set it in the near future – 2042. Thanks to various movies and documentaries, plus the photos taken by my self-employed son who’d spent a lot of time there on a contract, I chose Barcelona, in that fiercely independent region of Spain, Catalunya.

Then I needed characters, and again, I wanted to avoid the usual take on a vampire, on when and how he was ‘turned’. After various name and nationality changes, I ended up with Andreas Rousakis.

Here’s a clip, as Mark Kermode says in The Film Review:

Barcelona by urformat via Pixabay
Barcelona by urformat via Pixabay

Nearly a century ago, war had swept across Europe. Germany invaded Greece in 1941 and like many of his countrymen, Andreas had managed to get to Canada, where he was trained to fly sorties against the enemy. He ended up flying Spitfires out of Malta, providing fighter cover for the bombers and striking back at the German bombers and their Messerschmitt escorts. He’d been shot down over Italy, and after a month on the run, he’d been captured. He’d ended up in a concentration camp in Austria, close to the Hungarian border. The regime was brutal, the determination to survive so he could gain some kind of vengeance was the only thing that kept him alive for the next year.

Then Benedek Nagy had been brought to the camp. Benedek was a member of a small Hungarian Resistance group, and he had a couple of secrets. Like Andreas, he preferred men in his bed, something they both made sure their captors never discovered. They had become lovers, and it wasn’t long before Andreas learned the greater secret. Benedek was a vampire.

When news came that they were all to be shipped out to the notorious camp at Stutthof, Benedek had offered the men a devil’s bargain. He would make into a vampire whoever wished it, and they would spearhead a breakout, killing as many of the camp guards as they could and ultimately releasing all the prisoners. Andreas had been one of the ten volunteers.

My second main character, and one Andreas ultimately connects with on various levels, is Xavier Peres Escuderos, a small-time crook and gigolo, on the run from the police and the bad guys after he’d witnessed a murder and become Suspect Numero Uno. Xavi is – complicated. He’s stroppy, egotistical and a bit of a narcissist. He doesn’t need anyone or anything, least of all an overbearing, controlling bodyguard attempting to keep him in protective custody.

Another clip:

Narrow street, Barcelona by 495756 via Pixabay
Narrow street, Barcelona by 495756 via Pixabay

Xavi liked gold. Solid sunshine, it lay on his smooth, tanned skin and glowed. He smiled at his half-naked reflection in the cheval mirror, and hazel eyes gazed back at him, eyes that could look guileless or seductive with equal ease. His thick dark hair was combed and styled into place, and his mouth had a sensual swell to the under lip and a crisp shape to the upper. He turned his head a little and gauged the effect. Xavi had always considered his profile was like that of a Roman god-hero.

He touched his fingers to metal that was rapidly warming to his body-heat. It was a heavy curb chain, diamond-cut, its facets etched with fine arabesques, and it looked very good on him. There was more gold on Sophia’s dressing table, a careless tangle of necklaces and pendants and other assorted glitter that cost several fortunes, all treated with the same insouciance. But this one had been bought for him. She’d said she had a gift for him when she picked him up at their usual meeting place, but he hadn’t expected anything like this.

Sophia finished fastening the clasp at the back of his neck and kissed his shoulder as she came to stand beside him. “Beautiful,” she murmured.

“Yes,” Xavi said huskily. “You are.” But his eyes weren’t on her. He knew he looked good, knew that women were drawn to him like mares in season, and he revelled in it.

FOOL'S OATHTo be honest, I didn’t intend to write a sequel to Fool’s Errand, let alone turn it into a trilogy, but Xavi wouldn’t shut up. He wasn’t entirely settled into his relationship with Andreas, not to mention his new life in the public eye. They still had issues between them that needed to be worked out – and let’s face it, Xavi needed to grow the hell up and take responsibility for himself and his actions.

By the time I finished Fool’s Oath, I’d accepted that, yes, I had a trilogy on my hands. Months later, I completed Fool’s Rush, and gave the three books the overall title of Fool’s Odyssey.

However, I knew I wasn’t entirely finished with the vampire genre. There’s Fox Hunt, an entirely different setting and and entirely different people, but that’s for another time …

If you’re as intrigued as we were, you can find all the details about FOOL’S ERRAND, FOOL’S OATH and FOOL’S RUSH on the Manifold Press website!

The exceedingly Clever Baggers sponsoring Queer Company 2!

Queer Company iconA guest blog post
by Sandra Lindsey

Everyone loves a freebie, don’t they? Obviously, the prospect of a goodie bag isn’t the only reason delegates look forward to book-related festivals and conferences, but it certainly doesn’t hinder one’s enjoyment to return home with a quality, reusable souvenir which will make you smile with memories of the event.

Last year at Queer Company, we had very useful folders stuffed with interesting info and a fun anthology of short stories set in Oxford. This year, we have something a little different, and it’s all my fault…

You see, I have a personal connection to a company which specialises in printing eco-friendly cotton bags (among a whole host of other products, but the bags are where it all started). They’re called The Clever Baggers, they’re based here in the UK, and they offer a rainbow of different coloured cotton bags. At the Manifold Press AGM, I offered to ask if the company would be willing to sponsor Queer Company 2 by providing bags for us to fill with goodies and give out to all attendees.

They said yes!


I was lucky enough to be in the building the day our bags were printed, so I snapped a few photos of them being produced on the digital printers. I’ll try not to bore you with the technicalities, but for a variety of reasons, printing onto textiles is very different to printing onto paper. If you’re printing onto coloured (dyed) cloth, there are even more complications, and being able to do this digitally, i.e. directly onto the fabric by machine controlled by a computer, is a far more recent development than most people expect. In this instance, the machine applies a pre-treat to the bag, then prints a base-layer of the image in white, then prints the full colour image on top of this. All of the substances used in the process are water-based to make both process and product as eco-friendly as possible.


I was very impressed by the end result, and hope you will be too!


Everyone at Manifold Press HQ is certainly thrilled at the gorgeous results. We set The Clever Baggers a bit of a challenge with an event logo that looks lovely online but might not print very well. They’ve done us proud, though, as I’m sure you’ll all agree.

There are a very few tickets left for Queer Company 2. Do please join us if you can!


Researching B.W. (Before Wikipedia)

THE WALLED GARDENAn author guest blog
by F.M. Parkinson

When I wrote the original version of The Walled Garden, personal computers didn’t exist and the internet was a thing of dreams.  So what was it like then, researching and writing a novel?  How did it differ from researching and writing a novel today?  I had no easy access to information except through libraries and I didn’t live anywhere where there was a large library with a good reference section and a wide-range of stock on its shelves.  How could I find out what I needed to know, having set the novel in the England of the 1850s?  Books were certainly the answer but how could I get hold of ones with relevant information?

Above anything else, style was very important for the writing.  I didn’t want to write in the way I’d done short pieces up till then.  They were modern and reflected up-to-date language and pace.  I needed to know how people spoke to each other in the 1850s (at least in novels), as well as the sort of style an author used in writing a story.  Therefore I read novels published at that time, titles long forgotten these days, but still to be found quite easily then in second-hand bookshops.  I got the feel of the pace of the stories, the words used and the way in which authors used them.  Both the plots and the language used made me very aware of the class differences that existed at the time and how outwardly rigid society could be.  So I adopted the far more measured pace that novel writers used, and adapted their style to suit my own story.  The Walled Garden deliberately does not rush through the development of the plot or the relationship between Hillier and Ashton for that very reason.  As for the language used, I would refer back to the books of the 1850s if I was concerned as to whether a particular word or term was used then, or how words would have been phrased.

But I still needed a vast range of information.  I read up about the law concerning homosexuality (only it wasn’t called that then) in 19th century Britain, particularly the law as it stood in the 1850s.  Quite different in some ways from the earlier part of the century, as well as from the difficulties Oscar Wilde was later to be faced with.  I read about Victorian attitudes to sex.  Not just the public attitudes but those expressed in diaries and letters and certainly never intended for the public eye.  It became obvious that people in Victorian Britain were just as uninhibited and passionate as anyone today but they kept their behaviour far more private.  And how did I find the books I needed to discover such information?  By visiting the local library, checking its card catalogue, looking on the shelves to find books that might give me information, then looking through the bibliographies at the ends of the books for other titles that sounded as though they might be useful, and which I could borrow through inter-library loans.  It was a slow process.  One book took months to arrive and when it did, they had sent me the wrong volume (the library’s fault, not mine).  The relevant volume arrived in record time!

Looking back through my research notes, I have details on men’s clothing: their outer clothes, depending on their status in life; their underwear (it was amazingly difficult to find out what the 1850s man wore under his trousers); the hats they wore; their general appearance.  I have information on Victorian society of the time.  I found out about Victorian servants, their jobs, and the hierarchy that existed in households.  There are notes on bathrooms and plumbing in 19th century houses, on gardens and gardening, and flowers and plants that would have been grown at that time.

In libraries I found books that had photographs of London in the 1850s, including the parliament buildings and street scenes and houses to be found in the capital.  I came across articles on London life, and information on railway journeys and railway stock.  I read up about the Australian gold rush of the 1850s, and found out about illnesses that were common in Britain then and what sort of treatments were given to those who could call on a doctor for help.

I also wrote to museums and societies for information.  I have a letter from the Merseyside Maritime Museum giving me details about emigration from Liverpool to New York and which docks the ships sailed from, as well as listing books that I might find to be of use.  The National Railway Museum in York supplied me with details about Waterloo Station.  I wrote to the House of Commons Library when I realised that parliamentary sessions of that period did not begin and end at the times they do today, and they gave me precise dates for the years I needed, as well as information on the buildings associated with Westminster.

I was given recipes and details of foodstuffs that an invalid might eat, as suggested by Mrs Beeton.  I discovered newspapers from the 1850s in a very rundown second-hand bookshop, and they contained advertisements for servants for a variety of work and which was exactly what I needed.  I bought and studied plans of the Liverpool docks at that period and postcards of paintings of them.  Articles from The Illustrated London News, obtained through inter-library loan, were a mine of information on emigration and the whole process of leaving the country.

The house where I had set my story was then open to the public (it no longer is).  I visited it on a weekend away to that part of the country and was able to look at its layout and grounds, including an old walled kitchen garden.  I looked at plans and old photographs of the place, available from books on country houses and in guidebooks.

All this took some years (including several house moves and changes of job) and it was a case of constantly looking for information and checking what facts I could glean from the various sources.  Everything was typed up on a manual typewriter with carbon papers between several sheets for copies.  Insertions and additions meant pinning pieces of paper to the pages, or cutting up typed pages and rearranging where I wanted the text to go.  Amstrads were available by then but I certainly couldn’t afford to own one.  Compared with today’s ease of altering and amending text, it seems something of a marathon.

Would it be different today, now that the internet is available at the click of a mouse or a tap on a screen?  There is a vast amount of information ‘out there’ and it would certainly be easier to find out some of what I needed to know, as well as in contacting various museums and societies through email, rather than having to compose a letter and post it and then wait for ages for a reply.  I would be able to track down useful books and possibly a greater range of books than I could through looking at their bibliographies.  My library service now gives me access to encyclopaedias and the full Oxford English Dictionary, with updates, which would have been very helpful when deciding what words were appropriate for the 1850s and which were far too modern.

But not everything is on the internet and not everything on the internet is accurate, as we all know.  I still find in my current work that I usually have to go back to books for detailed information on a particular subject.  The internet cannot help me.  And details can make all the difference to a story.  However, I think we now have the best of both worlds.  When I came to revise the story for publication, the internet proved very helpful when I needed more photographs and descriptions of places and settings which I had not thought about before, so I was able to amend some details in the text (as well as taking editorial advice and cutting down on a cast of thousands, and rewriting the story in places).  But overall, the work I did originally was not negated by anything I found out during the revisions.  All the ways I used in order to do my research were of great help.  It’s perhaps just a little less complicated these days.

Spies and Blackguards!

Eleventh Hour by Elin GregoryAn author guest blog
by Elin Gregory

Spies are fascinating. From the earliest times there have been men and women who risk their lives by sneaking into enemy territory to try to see what’s going on there and establish how much of a threat there is. There are even spies mentioned in the Bible, reconnoitring before invading Palestine and establishing a safe house in Jericho. The Romans had their speculators, men who could sound out possible supporters in territories ripe for annexation and spy on enemy forces. Sir Francis Walsingham had an enormous network of spies in the 16th century, and the European powers cultivated promising young officers who might prove to be good players in The Great Game.

But it wasn’t until the 20th century that anything like a formal secret service was established in the UK. Partly this was due to a lordly assumption that the Brits didn’t NEED to spy, they were just that good, but it was coupled with a very damaging attitude that spying was ‘not playing the game’ and that we shouldn’t stoop so low. Between 1900 and 1909 a series of intelligence disasters, including the discovery of a very highly placed German mole in the Foreign Office finally convinced the powers in charge that some kind of overview was needed. Army intelligence didn’t speak to Navy and the fledgling air force reported to whoever it felt like. Someone needed to draw the threads together. A small room in the War Office, designated M05, was allocated and two Captains, one of the Staffordshire Regiment, invalided out of service due to his ill health and the other from Naval intelligence, were asked to form a formal Secret Service Bureau. Not a promising start yet they outstripped all expectations.

Captain Vernon Kell
Captain Vernon Kell

Plagued by illness from strenuous service, Captain Vernon Kell had served all over the world and absorbed languages like a sponge. He had a formidable intelligence that didn’t hesitate to use whatever means were available to fool the enemy. He even employed criminals, even ones in jail, to produce what is now called disinformation, sending out forged letters with inaccurate figures via the foreign powers’ own ‘letter boxes’.  He was also sensible enough to involve the police and worked with Scotland Yard to bring foreign spies to justice.  His organisation eventually became MI5.

Madison Smith-Cumming
Madison Smith-Cumming

Kell’s opposite number, head of the infant MI6, was Madison Smith-Cumming, later known as C. He was an incredible character in his own right. He had a monocle, walked with the aid of a swordstick and had his own personal tank. His wooden leg became a secret service legend, as he never told the same story of its loss twice.  Amongst other versions, he claimed that during a high speed chase he crashed his car and had to cut his own foot off with his pen knife to escape before he was caught by the enemy. But it is on record that he used to like to test the nerve of prospective spies by taking them out in his car and seeing how well they coped with being a passenger. He also used to startle people in meetings by stabbing himself in the wooden leg with a paperknife.  With such an original at the helm it’s no wonder that there was a ramshackle, ‘make it up as you go along’ vibe to many of their operations. C had to use whoever volunteered and while some were genuinely talented patriots others were venal or fools. “All my men are blackguards!” he complained after one spectacularly failed mission.  But they did enjoy some success and he encouraged technical innovation.

concealed weapon

Concealed weapons, waistcoat button cameras, even exploding pens were possible.  His men were also encouraged to improvise. Far from home and out of touch with their handlers, there would be plenty of times when they ran out of supplies and had to make do with whatever was to hand. For instance, C delighted in the discovery that semen makes an excellent invisible ink! However after a year or two of enthusiastic use – every man is his own fountain pen was one of his sayings – he had to recommend that it only be used with caution because the recipients of the notes complained of the smell.

If you are intrigued as we were to read Elin’s tale set in and around the British Secret Intelligence Service, do check out her novel ELEVENTH HOUR. It’s a cracking good yarn!

Elin will be off on a blog tour from Monday 22 August, during which she’ll be offering a giveaway of a backlist book plus a $10 gift card. We’ll post the links once they’re available.

Image sources:

  • Vernon Kell from the MI5 website.
  • Madison Smith-Cumming from a Daily Mail article (sorry).
  • The concealed weapon was from a now defunct eBay auction.
  • The photographers were unattributed at the source.



GHOST STATIONIt would probably not be letting too many cats out of too many bags to admit that books in general and characters in particular are usually inspired by someone or something the author has encountered in the course of everyday life.  It may be a poem, a snippet of history, a person met at random at a bus stop or in a hospital corridor, a picture discovered on the Internet – or, indeed, just about anything else.  (More than one book, for example, has been written as the result of someone playing a quest-type game, either online or with pencil and paper and a series of multi-faceted dice.)

My inspirations, on the whole, tend to be visual.  It would be disingenuous to pretend that I haven’t, in my time, written a considerable amount of fan-fiction, some of which I’m extremely proud of, but the problem with fan-fiction is that it only works if both the author and the reader are familiar with the source material.  That way there’s a kind of shorthand operating by which, for example, the name ‘Spock’ immediately conjures up a set of known reference points – he’s a Vulcan, his blood group is T-Negative, his parents are Sarek and Amanda, etc. etc. etc.  It isn’t necessary to explain why Spock does certain things in a fan story, because his character is so well established already that the reader knows what to expect from him.

When you want to branch out and start writing your own original fiction, it’s immediately necessary to explain things about your characters that the reader can’t possibly know in advance.  If you call your character ‘Tock’, say that he’s from a planet called Eros, his blood is X-Positive and his parents are Derek and Nora, you need to give your reader a chance to get to know him; the short-cuts offered by fan-fiction are no longer possible and, although you may have taken the TV (or indeed film) version of Spock as your inspiration, the reader has no way of knowing that and you are basically starting out to create your character completely from scratch.

On the other hand, this is also incredibly liberating; it means you get to discard features of the character you aren’t particularly fond of – you can get rid of an inconvenient spouse or partner or an irritating personal habit such as smoking – and reshape him or her to suit yourself.  At what point he or she ceases to be the one you remember and becomes an independent creation is, of course, a moot point; by the end, all you may be left with is a vague memory of a certain actor in a certain film or TV series – but the character on the page is no longer that person, if he ever was.  He has grown beyond that, and become uniquely himself.

This long preamble is by way of an explanation; I had unfinished business with the characters who eventually became Rick Wentworth and Harry Tilney, in the form of a piece of fan-fiction which was only ever half-written and was on my conscience for roughly thirty years.  I can’t begin to tell you the tumult those thirty years represented in my life – probably best if you don’t know, actually, since I’d like you to be able to sleep at night – but, when the dust settled and I began writing seriously at last, it was important to me to return to that world and finish what I’d started there.  Even if that meant going back to the very beginning and making the story over with characters who only superficially resembled the TV originals they’d once been.

If you start from scratch like that, it follows that you pretty much have to invent the details of the organisation the characters work for.  In both the original TV show and the book they are employees of a British organisation responsible for national security which is perpetually starved of funds.  They are cut-price James Bonds, the guys who do the day-to-day work and are more likely to end their day filling in forms than bedding a glamorous Soviet agent in a Mayfair hotel.  They have their American counterparts, too, who are always better-resourced – but which side they’re on is anybody’s guess!  And of course this is all set during the Cold War and it runs in parallel with John Le Carré’s ‘Smiley’ novels, because who wouldn’t want to write about the nitty-gritty of fieldwork in those days?  I once stayed in an East German hotel where the listening devices had only recently been removed; it isn’t difficult to imagine what it must have been like just a few years earlier.

Constructing the London headquarters of Ghost Station in my mind, however, was the best fun of the whole book.  I happen to be very fond of railways, and ghost stations in particular.  (If you’re not familiar with the expression, see  Very few abandoned Tube stations seem to have been repurposed, at least as far as the underground sections are concerned, and it seemed that such a station would make an ideal secret base.  It would be very similar, in fact, to Western Approaches Command in Liverpool, which I visited when I was writing MAKE DO AND MEND.  Locating it involved a happy few hours poring over Tube maps, and inventing a spur line in a part of London I know reasonably well, to give my characters somewhere to operate from; Mr Le Carré has his famous ‘Circus’, and I have my ‘Ghost Station’.

It would be tedious to go into all the details of the book and describe the inspirations behind them – although a gentle online stroll around the abandoned sanatorium at Beelitz-Heilstätten is always worthwhile.  Suffice it to say that, for any book, ideas can emerge from a bewildering variety of sources; the trick is combining them into something that will entertain the reader without taking too many liberties with anybody else’s copyrights.

Ray Lonnen and Roy Marsden in 'The Sandbaggers'
Ray Lonnen and Roy Marsden in ‘The Sandbaggers’

On which note, I feel it’s probably safe to reveal that the original inspirations for the characters in GHOST STATION, thirty years ago when it was intended as fan-fiction (and pure action-adventure without any sex!) were Roy Marsden and the late Ray Lonnen in ‘The Sandbaggers’.  That Rick and Harry grew a very long way beyond them and became other people goes without saying, I hope, but somewhere in the recesses of my mind they still look rather like Roy and Ray – as they were in the late 1970s, anyway – and for those who are not familiar with them this is how they looked back then.  (That’s Ray Lonnen on the left, Roy Marsden on the right.)  I really hope this revelation hasn’t ruined the book for anybody, though!

We’re delighted to announce that the paperback edition of GHOST STATION has just been released!

You can find it at:


The Valley of the Shadow of Death

THE VALLEY OF THE SHADOW OF DEATHThis novel began life some years ago as a screenplay for a film, as that seemed the ideal format for the story I wanted to tell. A cop and a mobster in Chicago finding an unlikely connection, and living for months in a dangerous limbo between their different worlds. Settings included homes and warehouses, a walk-in freezer and a bar fronting a gambling den, police stations and offices and courtrooms, a claustrophobic safe house and a few stolen hours of freedom outside the city. I imagined the actors having a fine time of it with Delaney, the cop whose naivety enables him to think ‘outside the box’, and Trezini, the mobster with a sense of irony.

Such things all seemed ideal for a film, so that’s how I initially wrote it. I got some good responses to the script, but it just wasn’t going to happen. I suspect the film industry is even harder to break into than the mainstream publishing industry, and (alas!) if I was ever going to break through this wasn’t the script that would do it for me.

So, eventually I decided to retell the story in novel form – and some while after that, it found a home with Manifold Press.

I suspect the filmic origins are sometimes obvious in the novel – especially the montage sequences! (I love a good montage.) There seemed no point in scrapping the whole thing and starting again with a blank page – though maybe I should have…? Instead I ‘converted’ the screenplay to prose, scene by scene. I was glad to be able to add in extra material, as there is a lot more room available in a novel. Also, I had to find ways of telling / showing elements in prose narrative rather than visually. Film is a very visual medium, and is far more about the visuals than dialogue. Of course, novels are all about the words, though they may convey visuals.

Another change I had to make was to be more specific about certain things. A film is a real team effort, involving all kinds of talented professionals. Hence, one of the rules about writing a screenplay is that you don’t try to tell those professionals how to do their job. You give them the necessary information about the story, perhaps including a few details that evoke the mood or specify the function of a scene. And then you step away and let them apply their own skills and experience to helping create the final result.

For example, if it’s absolutely vital to the story that the viewer can or can’t see a particular thing on screen, then say so in the script. Otherwise, let the DoP work the magic of cinematography! If it’s vital to the story that a character do or say something in a particular way, then write it that way or say so. Otherwise, let the actor interpret and present the role, and add their own layers to it. Film is a real collaboration, and is all the richer for it.

… You may have gathered by now that there’s still a part of me who is a frustrated film writer! And, indeed, even when I’m writing novels and stories, I still think in terms of film. That’s how I see the story play out in my mind, and my task is then to convert it into words. Which at times is far easier said than done!

If you’d care to read the results in this particular case, click here for the details of The Valley of the Shadow of Death. You may like to know, however, that while this is a love story, it is not a romance!


ALWAYS WITH US – the value of research!

ALWAYS WITH USI’d had the characters of Harrison Calderwood and Daniel Harper, in what became ALWAYS WITH US, in mind for a long time. I wanted to explore the way a relationship between two men of different social backgrounds would work, what the problems would be and how they would solve them. I considered various occupations before I made Harrison a solicitor; this made Daniel’s employment background easier to design, and it also meant that Harrison’s social position was good but not exalted.

Next was a location. At first I wanted a country setting and considered the market town of Nantwich, but it did not work for various reasons; neither did Manchester when I considered a city location. Looking at the problem I realised Liverpool would be perfect, and since I live nearby it should have been the first place I thought of.

Liverpool is a place I love and know well, and it had all the ingredients I needed i.e. culture and industry, great wealth contrasting with great poverty – and often literally side by side, as with the slum courts behind one of the most fashionable shopping streets in the city. There was also great philanthropy in practical and political action.

Social history has always interested me far more than battles and monarchs, and it was social history I studied at the Open University. I already had some background knowledge gained from reading about Father Nugent, a Roman Catholic priest who worked with his Anglican counterpart to help the poor of their city, its population swollen by the influx of Irish immigrants driven from their homes by the failure of the potato crop and their misery compounded by an outbreak of cholera in the city a year later.

As well as all this I also have family history interests in Liverpool and so had a good base of research material to draw on, supplemented by the internet.

I like to do on-the-spot research if possible and discover how long it takes to walk from one place to another and what you can see when you get there, so now it was time to venture out.

I have a wonderful ‘Writing Partner’ who doesn’t write herself but has inspired ideas, and is always willing to go on a field trip with me to find out whatever I need to know for a story. ALWAYS WITH US required several such field trips, and all of them somehow managed to include meals out. The first was to Nantwich, which has the most fantastic fish and chip restaurant and an Oxfam book shop in the same street – more than enough reason to visit in themselves – plus it is pretty and full of history, including many original black-and-white buildings, one of which was rebuilt in 1584.

A visit to the local museum provided the factual basis for the clothing factory in the story and information about shops existing in the 1890s, and the factory owner’s house was one I have always admired when passing it on the bus into town.

Southport, where part of the story takes place, required a trip to look at the local history exhibit and a walk out to the sand dunes to confirm what I remembered about the distances involved and the ‘feel’ of the place.

The visit of Harrison, Daniel and his son Joseph to Southport and the sand dunes leads directly to them making a visit to the Liverpool Museum, now a World Museum, to identify the colourful beetle Joseph found in the dunes; fortunately the public no longer have to climb the vertigo inducing steps to what was the main entrance!

I had researched the origin of the museum but hadn’t found out what it looked like on the inside, so I was amazed when Writing Partner and I arrived there to find a photograph in the entrance hall showing what it had looked like in the 1890s. To identify Joseph’s beetle I had spent some time with my book of insects looking for one with the right terrain and appearance to interest a boy of 11, and thus the Green Tiger Beetle took his place on the page.

Liverpool needed several visits, plus a consultation with my friend Rhiannon about where the Calderwood family was likely to live. On the basis of her advice I went, together with Writing Partner and Cimorene Ross (who was over on a visit) in search of houses for Harrison and Daniel. We conquered the local bus service and explored the area above the present Anglican Cathedral, finding a home for Harrison’s future sister-in-law and the church they would have attended. We discovered Daniel’s more modest lodgings further down the hill, and I based his landlady on my paternal grandmother.

Lunch this day was as the Anglican Cathedral; Writing Partner took exception to having her meal served on a plank and asked for a plate, which was reluctantly provided! I wanted chips with my cauliflower cheese (Fiona will agree with me here) not salad and they were reluctant about this as well, but I got my chips in the end and the food turned out to be very good indeed.

I knew what I wanted for the Calderwood home and hadn’t found it, so Writing Partner and I went to Sudley House – a lovely place that should be better known; a few (mental) alterations to that and Harrison had a home. The cakes were good there, too.

Having read this far, you will have realised that food plays a very important part in any research trip – not, I hasten to add, the most important part, but definitely one of the perks! More recently, Writing Partner has already accompanied me on several field trips for ROSES AND CASTLES – which will hopefully be my next book for Manifold Press, later in the year -and we’ve found another excellent fish and chip restaurant, this time in Middlewich. There really is a lot to be said for the value of research!


Author R.A. Padmos talks about the first title she published with Manifold Press, back in August 2011. She is giving away a paperback copy to one lucky reader. See below for details!

Ravages, a few years later

RAVAGES - 200pxWriting RAVAGES started with a simple question. What would it take for a Premier League footballer, in the middle of his career, to come out as gay? This idea resulted in a novel about the consequences of the brutal violence of a few, the friendship of many and the love of one very stubborn man.

Ravages was published in 2011. I had hoped, perhaps even expected, that a hugely popular sport like football (soccer) would by now have at least one or two openly gay players active in any of the major European competitions. At the moment of writing this article, in March 2016, there are no such players. I guess the reason for that is a complex mixture of culture, imagined and real risks, lack of courage (hey, manly men in their twenties have as much right to be scared as anyone else), money and public image.

As a lesbian with a history of being out to pretty much everyone I ever met since the late Seventies, I’ve seen the price people pay for being in the closet. After all those years, and having met far more accepting straight people than homophobic ones, I have yet to meet the first heterosexual who truly understands the complexity of telling yourself it’s all private and half-believing it’s actually the honest truth, while at the same time feeling something in your reasoning doesn’t quite add up. Even if there are, obviously, situations in which you’d better keep your mouth shut if you prefer to leave home on your own terms instead of being kicked out by mum and dad.

To be honest, I don’t believe for a moment, that 100% closeted gay footballers active in the Premier League are the rule. Assuming that there are gay players at the highest level, and why wouldn’t I, my guess is that most have at least some friends, family, team-mates and others who are in the know. So, what keeps them so unanimously hidden from their fans?

It’s not my, or anyone else’s, business if or when any gay footballer of (inter)national standing fully comes out of the closet, let that be absolutely clear. To be honest, I would find the whole matter utterly uninteresting if I wasn’t so aware of the fact that being even partly in the closet in a society where homosexuality is neither a crime nor a shame, is perhaps not the best thing you can do for your mental health. After all, some heterosexual players might be more private than others, but none of them will go out of their way (including telling downright lies) to hide the fact that they are straight.

I don’t need public figures to come out to make the world easier for me. I even think there is an argument to be made that it’s the other way around. We, the mostly nameless gays and lesbians, paved the road that led to nice stuff such as the legalisation of same-sex marriage, and one famous individual after another being openly gay, lesbian or bi.

But I also don’t see why people who play professional football in any of the big European competitions, should exclude themselves from the wonderful feeling of trusting other people’s decency and learning that they are strong enough to handle the surprisingly few truly ugly minds.

I’m giving away one paperback copy of Ravages, signed with a message of your choice. I will ship worldwide, so anyone can enter. Simply enter via the Book Giveaways form (no one but the site admins Fiona and Julie will see the details). I will randomly select the winner, and contact them for further information. I’d also love to hear from you via the comments, though!